My core philosophy is simple: deal with small problems while they are still small. A small problem handled well is a conversation. The same problem ignored for six months becomes a lawsuit, or worse, a culture where people stop believing that doing good work is what gets rewarded. Merit has to be the forcing function in a business, not office politics.
Training is one of the best tools for keeping problems small, when it is done right. Most of it is not. An annual video that everyone clicks through while answering email changes nothing, and everyone knows it. Training done right starts with knowing which kind of training you need.
Three kinds of training, three different jobs
1. Mandatory training: required, so do it well
Some training is required by law, by a contract, or by an insurer. Federal OSHA standards require training for specific hazards, such as hazard communication for workers exposed to hazardous chemicals and certification for forklift operators. The Department of Transportation requires supervisors of commercial drivers to complete reasonable-suspicion training on drugs and alcohol. Some industries, licenses, and customer contracts add their own.
Texas does not generally require private employers to provide harassment training. Do it anyway. Since September 1, 2021, the Texas sexual harassment statute reaches employers with even one employee. Under federal law, an employer that took reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct harassment can have a defense in some harassment cases, and good-faith efforts to comply with the law can protect an employer from punitive damages for a manager’s discriminatory decision. Training is part of the record that shows that care. A click-through video is a weak record. A live session tailored to your policies, with attendance and acknowledgments, is a strong one.
2. Training to drive a point
Sometimes the goal is not compliance. It is a message. Leadership wants every manager to understand that retaliation will not be tolerated, that complaints get investigated quickly, or that promotions are decided on performance and nothing else. A training session is how a company says that out loud, to everyone, in the same words, with real examples from its own workplace.
These sessions work when they are short, specific, and backed by visible action. If leadership says “merit decides” in a training and then promotes the boss’s favorite, the training made things worse.
3. Targeted training after an investigation
This is the kind most companies never use, and it is one of the most valuable. Many workplace investigations end in a gray zone. The evidence shows that the employee did not violate a serious policy, but walked the line too closely: the jokes that were not quite harassment, the manager who was not quite retaliating but kept bringing up the complaint, the texts sent after hours that made a coworker uncomfortable.
Discipline may not fit. Doing nothing definitely does not. Targeted, one-on-one or small-group training does:
- It tells the employee clearly where the line is and why they were too close to it.
- It treats them as someone worth developing, not someone being punished, which is exactly what keeps a small problem small.
- It creates a record. If the behavior continues, the company can show the employee knew the expectation, which matters for any later discipline, for a just-cause review, and for a Texas unemployment hearing, where the question is often whether the employee knew or should have known.
- It shows the person who raised the concern that the company acted, even without a finding of a violation.
Two cautions. Targeted training is not a substitute for discipline when a serious policy was violated. And it should never land on the person who complained in a way that looks like punishment for complaining.
Training does not stop at the class
The common failure of workplace training is that it ends when the session ends. People remember a fraction of what they hear in a class, and behavior changes only when it is practiced and reinforced on the job. The training models that HR teams have used for decades measure four levels: whether people liked it, whether they learned it, whether their behavior changed, and whether results improved. Most training stops at the first.
Training done right follows through:
- Practice during the session, with scenarios drawn from your workplace, not generic slides.
- A short commitment from each participant: one thing they will do differently.
- Check-ins at intervals after the session, with the participant and their manager, to see whether the new behavior shows up in real situations.
- A short refresher where the check-ins show the lesson has not stuck.
- A record of attendance, acknowledgments, and follow-up, for the company’s file.
For targeted training especially, the check-ins are the point. The goal is real development in the real world: a manager who now handles a complaint the right way, an employee whose behavior has actually changed. That is how a gray-zone investigation ends with a better employee instead of a second complaint.
Tailored fast, with AI
Generic training fails because people cannot see their own workplace in it. Crawford Law keeps a full suite of trainings, from harassment prevention and manager essentials to leave and accommodations, investigations, merit-based interviewing, and union workplaces, and uses AI tools to tailor them quickly to your policies, your industry, and the situations your managers actually face. What used to take weeks of customization takes days. Every module is reviewed, finalized, and taught by a lawyer, so speed never comes at the cost of accuracy.
A quick check of your training program
- Do you know which trainings are legally required for your workforce, and are they current?
- Does your harassment training use your own policy and complaint process, and is it live for managers?
- When an investigation ends in a gray zone, do you have a targeted training response?
- Does anyone follow up after a training to see whether behavior changed?
- Could you produce attendance and acknowledgment records tomorrow?
If the answer to any of those is no, start there. See the full list of trainings, or request a free call.
Sources
- Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998)
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998)
- Kolstad v. American Dental Association, 527 U.S. 526 (1999)
- Texas Labor Code § 21.141 (sexual harassment; employers with one or more employees), added by S.B. 45 (2021)
- OSHA, Hazard Communication training, 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200(h)
- OSHA, Powered industrial truck operator training, 29 C.F.R. § 1910.178(l)
- U.S. DOT, Supervisor training for reasonable suspicion, 49 C.F.R. § 382.603