When employees choose a union, the company’s legal relationship with them changes overnight, even though the work does not. Managers who were used to adjusting schedules, giving a raise to a strong performer, or talking through a new policy with the team now face rules that make some of those ordinary decisions unfair labor practices. I spent years in labor relations across union and non-union warehouses, and the charges I saw most often came from good managers doing what used to be normal.

Two rules cause most of the trouble: the status quo, and the ban on direct dealing.

The status quo rule

Once a union is certified or recognized, and while a contract is being negotiated, an employer generally may not change wages, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment without first giving the union notice and a chance to bargain. The Supreme Court has held that a unilateral change during bargaining is a refusal to bargain, even if the employer acts in good faith and even if the change benefits employees.

That catches people off guard in both directions:

  • Improvements count. A new bonus, a schedule perk, or a better attendance policy announced without bargaining can be an unfair labor practice.
  • Freezing everything can also be wrong. The status quo is dynamic. If the company has an established practice, such as annual raises every January using a set formula, continuing that practice is the status quo, and stopping it can be an unlawful change.
  • Discretion is the hard part. Under current Board law, changes that involve significant management discretion can require bargaining even if similar changes were made in the past. That standard has moved back and forth over the years, so assume a discretionary change needs notice to the union until counsel says otherwise.

Managing through the status quo

  1. Write down the baseline on the day bargaining obligations begin: pay practices, schedules, policies, and how discretionary decisions were actually made.
  2. Sort upcoming decisions into routine and fixed (continue them), discretionary (notify the union and offer to bargain), and new (bargain first).
  3. Give notice early. Notice of a proposed change, with time to bargain before it takes effect, solves most problems. A decision already made is not notice.
  4. Bargain to agreement or a genuine impasse before implementing, except in a true emergency.
  5. Keep discipline consistent with the existing policy. Discipline under existing rules can continue, but the union is entitled to information about it and to bargain over it.

Direct dealing

Once employees have a representative, the employer must deal with the union, not around it. Direct dealing generally means communicating with represented employees to set or change their terms and conditions of employment, or in a way that undercuts the union’s role, without the union.

Common examples:

  • Asking employees whether they would accept a different schedule or a change to overtime rules before raising it with the union.
  • Surveying represented employees about what they want in the contract.
  • Negotiating an individual arrangement with an employee on a subject covered by bargaining.
  • Suggesting that employees would get a better deal if they dropped a union demand.

What remains allowed: talking to employees about the work itself, running the business day to day, and sharing accurate information about proposals the company has already made at the table, without bargaining over them with employees. The line is between informing and negotiating.

Information requests

A union is entitled to information relevant to its role as bargaining representative, such as wage data, job descriptions, policies, and discipline records for unit employees. Ignoring or slow-walking a relevant request is itself an unfair labor practice. Respond promptly, ask for clarification or raise confidentiality concerns in writing when they are real, and keep a log of every request and response. Accurate job descriptions and clean pay records make this much easier.

Investigations and discipline with a union

Represented employees can ask for a union representative in an investigatory interview they reasonably believe may lead to discipline. Plan for it: tell supervisors, allow the request, and do not continue the interview without the representative once it is asked for. The fundamentals of a good investigation are the same, and the just-cause standard most contracts adopt makes them more important, not less.

Communication during bargaining

  • Choose one voice for bargaining updates, review every message before it goes out, and never characterize the union’s motives.
  • Keep supervisors out of bargaining conversations with employees. Their answer to “What is the company offering?” is “Bargaining is happening with the union, and updates come from the company.”
  • Remember the campaign rules still apply: no threats, promises, interrogation, or surveillance. See union organizing and the NLRB in 2026.

Where the firm fits

I advise management teams before and during first-contract and renewal bargaining, prepare the baseline and decision process for the status quo, train supervisors on direct dealing and Weingarten, manage information requests, and respond to unfair labor practice charges. The goal is the same as always: deal with small problems while they are still small, so they do not become charges, and keep the focus on running a productive workplace that pays and develops people well.

Sources

  1. National Labor Relations Act § 8(a)(5) and § 8(d), 29 U.S.C. § 158
  2. NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 (1962)
  3. NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432 (1967)
  4. Permanente Medical Group, 332 NLRB 1143 (2000) (direct dealing)
  5. Wendt Corp., 372 NLRB No. 135 (2023) (discretionary changes and past practice)
  6. NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975)